OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Vivo X300
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Vivo X300 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9300; launch prices were $600 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 79/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 3,037,992); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 206g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Vivo X300
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 3037992
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 206g
- Better camera (94/100 vs 78/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo X300 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 2186 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 7422 vs 6405
- Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $600
- Higher performance (86/100 vs 82/100)
- Longer battery life (69/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Vivo X300, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 4 points higher (83/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 78/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Vivo X300 — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro are nearly equal (86/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro are nearly equal (69/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Vivo X300 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 3037992 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 2186 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 7422 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 150.6×71.9×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 206 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $499 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300
- Main: 50MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Vivo X300, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Vivo X300 by 1.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $101. Vivo X300 was $101 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro are nearly equal (86/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 (94/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro are nearly equal (69/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X300?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro edges out the Vivo X300 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Vivo X300?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo X300 — 79/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X300?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 78/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Vivo X300?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.