OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $600 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 83/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6700); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,079,298); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $950
- Better display (95/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3079298
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6405
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6700 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 94/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 8 points higher (91/100 vs 83/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 66/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno16 Pro are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (85/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (64/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $950 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads OPPO Reno16 Pro by 27.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $350. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $350 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (99/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno16 Pro are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (85/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (64/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the OPPO Reno16 Pro by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.