OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $600 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 83/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6700); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,079,298); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the OPPO Reno16 Pro by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

OPPO Reno16 Pro

Performance 82
Display 95
Camera 94
Battery 66
Portability 64
Value for money 80

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?

  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 188g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $950

  • Better display (95/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (64/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3079298
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1555
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6405
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 82/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 94/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 66/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 8 points higher (91/100 vs 83/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 66/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno16 Pro are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (85/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (64/100 vs 39/100).

OPPO Reno16 Pro: The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification OPPO Reno16 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3079298 4247433
Geekbench Single 1555 3639
Geekbench Multi 6405 11047
Display 6.3" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1216x2640 3168x1440
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6700 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 80W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 200 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 200 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IP69
Dimensions 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 188 g 230 g
Launch price $600 $950

Camera comparison

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • 6.3" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2640
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
95
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • 6700 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
66
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Reno16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super
83/100
3079298 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +27.5%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads OPPO Reno16 Pro by 27.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OPPO Reno16 Pro

$600

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $350. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $350 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (99/100 vs 82/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno16 Pro are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (85/100 vs 66/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (64/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the OPPO Reno16 Pro by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 82/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.