OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $600 and $2199. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 78/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 5000); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,453,998 vs 3,079,298); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 215g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 60W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 215g
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $2199
- Better camera (94/100 vs 67/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 61/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 78/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3453998 vs 3079298
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6405
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 82/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 5 points higher (83/100 vs 78/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 67/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 64/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (95/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (94/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and the OPPO Reno16 Pro are nearly equal (66/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 3453998 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 1968x2184 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 188 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $2199 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads OPPO Reno16 Pro by 10.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1599. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $1599 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (95/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (94/100 vs 67/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 61/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and the OPPO Reno16 Pro are nearly equal (66/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 78/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 67/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.