OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $600 and $1999. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 70/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 2,814,251); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 215g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 2814251
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 215g
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $1999
- Better camera (94/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 44/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6405
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 13 points higher (83/100 vs 70/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads (93/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (66/100 vs 52/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 — 48/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a bit better (93/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (95/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (94/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (64/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 2814251 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 1968x2184 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 188 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $1999 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 by 9.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1399. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $1399 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a bit better (93/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (95/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (94/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (64/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 — 70/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads on performance (93/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a better fit for gamers and power users.