Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1499 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 64/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,515,964 vs 3,379,591); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 214g).
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Faster charging: 68W vs 60W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 25W
- Lighter: 199g vs 214g
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 51/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 32/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3515964 vs 3379591
- Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 3050
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 9300
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper: $1299 vs $1499
- Higher performance (84/100 vs 73/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 58/100)
- Better value for money (20/100 vs 6/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 11 points higher (75/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (84/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (20/100 vs 6/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (84/100 vs 73/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (86/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (54/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (51/100 vs 32/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (20/100 vs 6/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 3515964 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | 3601 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | 10686 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 25W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 157 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 214 g | |
| Price | $1499 | $1299 |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 by 3.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $200. Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is cheaper by $200.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (84/100 vs 73/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (86/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (54/100 vs 51/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (51/100 vs 32/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (20/100 vs 6/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 58/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (84/100 vs 73/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.