Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1531 and $2899. Both devices score the same overall rating of 69/100. Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4400); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 2,926,532); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is noticeably lighter (215g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 2926532
- Lighter: 215g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $1531 vs $2899
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
- Better display (78/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 20/100)
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 39/100)
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold received the same MobileRank rating — 69/100. In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (78/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 52/100. In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (63/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (66/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 42/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9494 | |
| Display | 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2 | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1968x2184 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 215 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $1531 | $2899 |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 6.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1368. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is cheaper by $1368.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (78/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 52/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (63/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (66/100 vs 20/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 42/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
Both devices scored 69/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.