Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $799 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads — 75/100 vs 69/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,126 vs 2,926,532); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S26
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3161126 vs 2926532
- Lighter: 162g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $2899
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (77/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (89/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2880
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 9100
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 31/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy S26 scores 6 points higher (75/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (77/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26 — 64/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a bit better (81/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (77/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (63/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (89/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3161126 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2880 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9100 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 146 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 162 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $799 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 8.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2100. Samsung Galaxy S26 was $2100 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a bit better (81/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (77/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (63/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (89/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on camera score (77/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.