Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1299 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 66/100 vs 57/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 2,800,202); the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is noticeably lighter (218g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 3050
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 9300
- Lighter: 218g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $1299 vs $2899
- Better camera (81/100 vs 49/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (20/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 2800202
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 45/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 9 points higher (66/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 49/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (20/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 67/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (81/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (20/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2800202 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3100 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9760 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 151 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / One UI 7 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 218 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $1299 | $2899 |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra by 4.3% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1600. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is cheaper by $1600.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 67/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (81/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 45/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (27/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (20/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 49/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.