Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $1799 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 86/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,269,794); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 164); the Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably lighter (226g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Vivo X300 Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3269794
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3228
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9553
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 93/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 226g vs 285g
- Cheaper: $899 vs $1799
- Better camera (96/100 vs 91/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 76/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 1 points higher (87/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 68/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 76/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (98/100 vs 93/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 91/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (86/100 vs 76/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 9553 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 226 g | |
| Price | $1799 | $899 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Vivo X300 Pro by 20.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $900. Vivo X300 Pro is cheaper by $900.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (98/100 vs 93/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 91/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (86/100 vs 76/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the Motorola Razr Fold by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 91/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (98/100 vs 93/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.