Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1799 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 83/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 3,057,215); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 164); the Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably lighter (226g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Better portability (52/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 3057215
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2833
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 9119
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 226g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $1799
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 91/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 5 points higher (88/100 vs 83/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 91/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 10243 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Razr Fold by 8.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $900. Vivo X300 Pro was $900 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 91/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the Motorola Razr Fold by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 91/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.