Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 17
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the Xiaomi 17 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $899 and $709. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 87/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,587,829 vs 3,404,616); the Xiaomi 17 is noticeably lighter (191g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Pro
Xiaomi 17
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3587829 vs 3404616
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10402 vs 10162
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3566 vs 3352
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6510 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 191g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $709 vs $899
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 81/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (63/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the Xiaomi 17, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 1 points higher (88/100 vs 87/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 81/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100, Xiaomi 17 — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 95/100. In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 is a bit better (87/100 vs 81/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (63/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | Xiaomi 17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3587829 | 3404616 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3352 | 3566 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10402 | 10162 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 2656x1200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / HyperOS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 151.1×71.8×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 191 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | $709 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2656x1200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 15:00 hrs, total 33:58 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Pro and Xiaomi 17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Xiaomi 17 by 5.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $190. Xiaomi 17 was $190 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 95/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 (96/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 is a bit better (87/100 vs 81/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (63/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17?
The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the Xiaomi 17 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the Xiaomi 17 — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the Xiaomi 17?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.