Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $899 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 88/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,600,724 vs 3,326,259); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 166).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Pro
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $999
- Better camera (96/100 vs 93/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3600724 vs 3326259
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3293
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10243
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 94/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 1 points higher (89/100 vs 88/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (97/100 vs 94/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (96/100 vs 93/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (43/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | Xiaomi 17 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3326259 | 3600724 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3293 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10243 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | 166 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | $999 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Pro and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Vivo X300 Pro by 7.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $100. Vivo X300 Pro was $100 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (97/100 vs 94/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (96/100 vs 93/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (43/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra edges out the Vivo X300 Pro by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.