Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $899 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads — 84/100 vs 78/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,998,145 vs 3,269,794); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 159).
Vivo X300 Pro
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper: $899 vs $999
- Better camera (96/100 vs 87/100)
- Better value for money (48/100 vs 41/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3998145 vs 3269794
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3228
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9553
- Bigger battery: 7500 vs 6510 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Higher refresh rate: 2160Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 219g vs 226g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 74/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 73/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (26/100 vs 17/100)
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max scores 6 points higher (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (92/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (92/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (82/100 vs 73/100). In the "design" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (26/100 vs 17/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (48/100 vs 41/100).
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3269794 | 3998145 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3228 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9553 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 2160 Hz | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 7500 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | 159 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 219 g | |
| Price | $899 | $999 |
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 2160 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 7500 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:28 hrs, total 36:26 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Vivo X300 Pro and Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads Vivo X300 Pro by 18.2% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $100. Vivo X300 Pro is cheaper by $100.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (92/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (82/100 vs 73/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (26/100 vs 17/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (48/100 vs 41/100).
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max edges out the Vivo X300 Pro by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 87/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on performance (92/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.