Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $899 and $999. Both devices score the same overall rating of 88/100. Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,998,145 vs 3,326,259); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 159).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Pro
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $999
- Better camera (96/100 vs 87/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Pro Max better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3998145 vs 3326259
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3293
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10243
- Bigger battery: 7500 vs 6510 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 219g vs 226g
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 94/100)
- Longer battery life (89/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (48/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
The Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max received the same MobileRank rating — 88/100. Value score: Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100, Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (98/100 vs 94/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3326259 | 3998145 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3293 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10243 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 7500 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | 159 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | $999 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.69
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 7500 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:28 hrs, total 36:26 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Pro and Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads Vivo X300 Pro by 16.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $100. Vivo X300 Pro was $100 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (98/100 vs 94/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
Both devices scored 88/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (98/100 vs 94/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 87/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.