Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $899 and $892. Both devices score the same overall rating of 87/100. Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has the bigger battery (6800 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,269,794).
Vivo X300 Pro
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 87/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 42/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3269794
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3228
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9553
- Bigger battery: 6800 vs 6510 mAh
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 224g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $892 vs $899
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 93/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 81/100)
The Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) received the same MobileRank rating — 87/100. Value score: Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (98/100 vs 93/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3269794 | 3942923 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3228 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9553 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 6800 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 224 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | $892 |
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6800 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Vivo X300 Pro and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Vivo X300 Pro by 17.1% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $7. Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) was $7 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (98/100 vs 93/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
Both devices scored 87/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 87/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 93/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.