Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $899 and $892. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 87/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has the bigger battery (6800 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 3,326,259).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Pro
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 87/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 3326259
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3293
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10243
- Bigger battery: 6800 vs 6510 mAh
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 224g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $892 vs $899
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 94/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Vivo X300 Pro scores 1 points higher (88/100 vs 87/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (98/100 vs 94/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3326259 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3293 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10243 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 6800 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 224 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | $892 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6800 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Pro and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Vivo X300 Pro by 15.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $7. Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) was $7 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (98/100 vs 94/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 87/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.