Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6; launch prices were $1799 and $840. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 83/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 3,057,215); the Vivo iQOO 16 is noticeably lighter (223g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Better camera (91/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 3057215
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 2833
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 9119
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 223g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $840 vs $1799
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 90/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 6 points higher (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 90/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (100/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 12873 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $840 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Motorola Razr Fold by 44.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $959. Vivo iQOO 16 was $959 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (100/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (99/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (90/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 edges out the Motorola Razr Fold by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 90/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.