Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1799 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 87/100 vs 77/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,942,923); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 164); the Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably lighter (230g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Overall rating 77/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3942923
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 230g vs 285g
- Cheaper: $950 vs $1799
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 91/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 51/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (12/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (44/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 10 points higher (87/100 vs 77/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (77/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (44/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (96/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 91/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (77/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (12/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (44/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 11033 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $1799 | $950 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Razr Fold by 7.2% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $849. Vivo X300 Ultra is cheaper by $849.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (96/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 91/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (77/100 vs 51/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (12/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (44/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr Fold — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 91/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.