Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1799 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 83/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,057,215); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 164); the Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably lighter (230g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Better portability (52/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3057215
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2833
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9119
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 230g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $950 vs $1799
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 91/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 8 points higher (91/100 vs 83/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 91/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (85/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 11047 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Razr Fold by 28.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $849. Vivo X300 Ultra was $849 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 91/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (85/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Motorola Razr Fold by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 91/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 90/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.