Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1099 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 87/100 vs 73/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,942,923); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 230g).
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 230g
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 12/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3942923
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Cheaper: $950 vs $1099
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (44/100 vs 34/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 14 points higher (87/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (77/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (44/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (96/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (77/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (51/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (44/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 11033 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $950 |
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Razr 70 Ultra by 7.2% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $149. Vivo X300 Ultra is cheaper by $149.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (96/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (96/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (77/100 vs 51/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (51/100 vs 12/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (44/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.