Motorola Signature vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Motorola Signature (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $699 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 87/100 vs 86/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,942,923); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 164); the Motorola Signature is noticeably lighter (186g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Motorola Signature by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Signature
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 91
Battery 68
Design 67
Value for money 62
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 96
Display 100
Camera 96
Battery 77
Design 12
Value for money 44
What makes Motorola Signature better?
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 186g vs 230g
  • Cheaper: $699 vs $950

  • Better design/ergonomics (67/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better value for money (62/100 vs 44/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3942923
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 92/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 91/100)
  • Longer battery life (77/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Signature vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 1 points higher (87/100 vs 86/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Signature leads (62/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Motorola Signature are nearly equal (96/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 91/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (77/100 vs 68/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (67/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (62/100 vs 44/100).

Motorola Signature: The Motorola Signature is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Signature Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3942923 4247433
Geekbench Single 3640 3640
Geekbench Multi 11033 11033
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1264x2780 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 90W 100W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 164 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 6200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 162.1×76.4×7.0 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 186 g 230 g
Price $699 $950
Camera comparison
Motorola Signature
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Signature
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1264x2780
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Signature
  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
68
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
77
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Signature and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
86/100
3942923 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
87/100 +7.2%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Signature by 7.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Signature
$699
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Price difference: $251. Motorola Signature is cheaper by $251.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Motorola Signature are nearly equal (96/100 vs 92/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 91/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (77/100 vs 68/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (67/100 vs 12/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (62/100 vs 44/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Signature or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Motorola Signature by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Signature and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Motorola Signature has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Signature or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 91/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Signature over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Motorola Signature is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.