Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1099 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 76/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,962,094); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 230g
- Better display (94/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2962094
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Cheaper at launch: $950 vs $1099
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 15 points higher (91/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (85/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (68/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 11047 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 30.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $149. Vivo X300 Ultra was $149 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (96/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (85/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (68/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 91/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.