Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo X500 Pro
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro; launch prices were $1099 and $970. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 76/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4700); the Vivo X500 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (5,016,623 vs 2,962,094).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Vivo X500 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Better portability (68/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5016623 vs 2962094
- Better Geekbench Single: 4188 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 13145 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Lighter: 192g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $970 vs $1099
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 14 points higher (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (87/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Vivo X500 Pro — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (100/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (87/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X500 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 5016623 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 4188 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 13145 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.4" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1216x2660 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $970 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X500 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2660
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Vivo X500 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X500 Pro leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 41.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $129. Vivo X500 Pro was $129 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (100/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (87/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 91/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.