Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Vivo X500 Pro

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro; launch prices were $1499 and $970. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 78/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X500 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (5,016,623 vs 3,379,591).

The Vivo X500 Pro is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

Performance 92
Display 95
Camera 60
Battery 64
Portability 68
Value for money 66

Vivo X500 Pro

Performance 100
Display 94
Camera 87
Battery 81
Portability 63
Value for money 92

What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?

  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz

  • Better display (95/100 vs 94/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 63/100)

What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5016623 vs 3379591
  • Better Geekbench Single: 4188 vs 3013
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 13145 vs 9287
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
  • Lighter: 192g vs 199g
  • Cheaper at launch: $970 vs $1499

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 92/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 60/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 64/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 12 points higher (90/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (87/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Vivo X500 Pro — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (100/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Vivo X500 Pro are nearly equal (95/100 vs 94/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (87/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026: The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo X500 Pro: The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Vivo X500 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
AnTuTu 3379591 5016623
Geekbench Single 3013 4188
Geekbench Multi 9287 13145
Display 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2992 1216x2660
Refresh rate 165 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 68W 90W
Wireless charging 30W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 50 MP 50 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB
Storage 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 17
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm
Weight 199 g 192 g
Launch price $1499 $970

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera

Vivo X500 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

  • 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
95
display

Vivo X500 Pro

  • 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2660
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
64
battery

Vivo X500 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Vivo X500 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
78/100
3379591 AnTuTu
Vivo X500 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
90/100 +32.6%
5016623 AnTuTu

Vivo X500 Pro leads Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 by 32.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

$1499

Vivo X500 Pro

$970

Launch price difference: $529. Vivo X500 Pro was $529 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (100/100 vs 92/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Vivo X500 Pro are nearly equal (95/100 vs 94/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (87/100 vs 60/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (81/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 60/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 92/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.