Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6; launch prices were $1499 and $840. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 78/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 3,379,591); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Lighter: 199g vs 223g
- Better portability (68/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 3379591
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Cheaper at launch: $840 vs $1499
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 64/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 95/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 11 points higher (89/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (100/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (99/100 vs 95/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (78/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (90/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (68/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 12873 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $840 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 by 38.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $659. Vivo iQOO 16 was $659 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (100/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (99/100 vs 95/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (78/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (90/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (68/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 60/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 92/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.