Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo iQOO 15T

The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $1799 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 75/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,815,522); the Vivo iQOO 15T is noticeably lighter (216g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Vivo iQOO 15T by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 91
Battery 51
Design 0
Value for money 0
Vivo iQOO 15T
Performance 82
Display 100
Camera 63
Battery 74
Design 30
Value for money 75
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3815522
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3228
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9553

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 82/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15T better?
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 216g vs 285g
  • Cheaper: $499 vs $1799

  • Longer battery life (74/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (30/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (75/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Vivo iQOO 15T, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 2 points higher (77/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (74/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (75/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (92/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (91/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (74/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (30/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (75/100 vs 0/100).

Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo iQOO 15T: The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr Fold Vivo iQOO 15T
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 3942923 3815522
Geekbench Single 3640 3228
Geekbench Multi 11033 9553
Display 8.1" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2480x2200 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 8000 mAh
Charging 68W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 164
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 6200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX9 IP68
Dimensions 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm
Weight 285 g 216 g
Price $1799 $499
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera
Vivo iQOO 15T
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
63
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Vivo iQOO 15T
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
51
battery
Vivo iQOO 15T
  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
74
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Vivo iQOO 15T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
77/100
3942923 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15T MediaTek Dimensity 9500
75/100 -3.3%
3815522 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Vivo iQOO 15T by 3.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr Fold
$1799
Vivo iQOO 15T
$499

Price difference: $1300. Vivo iQOO 15T is cheaper by $1300.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (92/100 vs 82/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (91/100 vs 63/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (74/100 vs 51/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (30/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (75/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Vivo iQOO 15T by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo iQOO 15T — 75/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 63/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 82/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.