Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $1499 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 78/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 3,269,794); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 226g).
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Vivo X300 Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 3269794
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 226g
- Better display (95/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 43/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 9494
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Cheaper: $899 vs $1499
- Better camera (96/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 64/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 62/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 9 points higher (87/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 93/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (96/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (68/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (86/100 vs 62/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9553 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 226 g | |
| Price | $1499 | $899 |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Vivo X300 Pro by 3.4% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $600. Vivo X300 Pro is cheaper by $600.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 93/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (96/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (81/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (68/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (86/100 vs 62/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.