Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1499 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 78/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 3,326,259); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 3326259
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 226g
- Better display (95/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $1499
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 10 points higher (88/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (96/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (68/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 10243 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Vivo X300 Pro by 1.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $600. Vivo X300 Pro was $600 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (96/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (81/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (68/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.