Motorola Signature vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Motorola Signature (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $699 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Signature leads — 89/100 vs 87/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Signature is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,269,794); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 164); the Motorola Signature is noticeably lighter (186g vs 226g).

The Motorola Signature edges out the Vivo X300 Pro by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Signature
Performance 98
Display 84
Camera 91
Battery 77
Portability 78
Value for money 90
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Motorola Signature better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3269794
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3228
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9553
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 186g vs 226g
  • Cheaper: $699 vs $899

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 93/100)
  • Better portability (78/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better value for money (90/100 vs 86/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5200 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Better camera (96/100 vs 91/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 77/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Signature vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Motorola Signature scores 2 points higher (89/100 vs 87/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (98/100 vs 93/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 91/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Signature are nearly equal (81/100 vs 77/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (78/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Signature and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (90/100 vs 86/100).

Motorola Signature: The Motorola Signature is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Signature Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 3942923 3269794
Geekbench Single 3640 3228
Geekbench Multi 11033 9553
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1264x2780 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 90W 90W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 164 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 6200 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.1×76.4×7.0 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 186 g 226 g
Price $699 $899
Camera comparison
Motorola Signature
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Signature
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1264x2780
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Signature
  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
77
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Signature and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100
3942923 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 -20.6%
3269794 AnTuTu

Motorola Signature leads Vivo X300 Pro by 20.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Signature
$699
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Price difference: $200. Motorola Signature is cheaper by $200.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (98/100 vs 93/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 91/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Signature are nearly equal (81/100 vs 77/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (78/100 vs 43/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Signature and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (90/100 vs 86/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Signature or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Motorola Signature edges out the Vivo X300 Pro by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Signature and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Motorola Signature has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Signature or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 91/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Signature or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Motorola Signature leads on performance (98/100 vs 93/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Signature over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Motorola Signature is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.