Motorola Signature vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Motorola Signature (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $699 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 86/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,587,829 vs 3,057,215); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 164); the Motorola Signature is noticeably lighter (186g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Signature
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Motorola Signature better?
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 186g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $699 vs $899
- Better portability (78/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3587829 vs 3057215
- Better Geekbench Single: 3352 vs 2833
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10402 vs 9119
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5200 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 91/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 77/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Signature vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 2 points higher (88/100 vs 86/100). Value score: Motorola Signature — 86/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 91/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Signature are nearly equal (81/100 vs 77/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (78/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Signature | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 3587829 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 3352 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 10402 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×76.4×7.0 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $699 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Signature
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Signature
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Signature
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Signature and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Signature by 14.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $200. Motorola Signature was $200 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 91/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Signature are nearly equal (81/100 vs 77/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (78/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Signature or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the Motorola Signature by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Signature and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Signature has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Signature or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 91/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Signature or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (95/100 vs 90/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Signature over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Signature is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.