Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1099 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 76/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 2,962,094); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 226g
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 2962094
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $1099
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 12 points higher (88/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (68/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 10243 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 10.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $200. Vivo X300 Pro was $200 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (96/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (68/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.