Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $1099 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 76/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 3,113,462); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 226g).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 226g
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 3113462
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 9494
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Cheaper: $899 vs $1099
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 58/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 11 points higher (87/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (68/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (86/100 vs 64/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9553 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 226 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $899 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 4.8% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $200. Vivo X300 Pro is cheaper by $200.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (96/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (68/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (86/100 vs 64/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.