Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the Xiaomi 17T Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $899 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 82/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17T Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 3,182,664); the Xiaomi 17T Pro is noticeably lighter (205g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Pro
Xiaomi 17T Pro
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 3182664
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 93/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17T Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6510 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 205g vs 226g
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 81/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the Xiaomi 17T Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 6 points higher (88/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100, Xiaomi 17T Pro — 76/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17T Pro are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17T Pro (96/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (87/100 vs 81/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | Xiaomi 17T Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3326259 | 3182664 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3293 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10243 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 2772x1280 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 226 g | 205 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 18:30 hrs, total 36:42 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Pro and Xiaomi 17T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Xiaomi 17T Pro by 4.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $0. Same launch price.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17T Pro are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17T Pro (96/100 vs 63/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (87/100 vs 81/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the Xiaomi 17T Pro by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the Xiaomi 17T Pro — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 63/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.