Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi 17T Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $950 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 82/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,207,005); the Xiaomi 17T Pro is noticeably lighter (205g vs 230g).
Vivo X300 Ultra
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3207005
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3228
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9553
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 93/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 63/100)
- Better value for money (94/100 vs 76/100)
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 205g vs 230g
- Cheaper: $899 vs $950
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 85/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 17T Pro, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 9 points higher (91/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 63/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17T Pro (96/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (87/100 vs 85/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17T Pro (94/100 vs 76/100).
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi 17T Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | 3207005 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 2772x1280 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 230 g | 205 g | |
| Price | $950 | $899 |
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 18:30 hrs, total 36:42 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 17T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi 17T Pro by 32.4% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $51. Xiaomi 17T Pro is cheaper by $51.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17T Pro (96/100 vs 63/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (87/100 vs 85/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17T Pro (94/100 vs 76/100).
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Xiaomi 17T Pro by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi 17T Pro — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 63/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 93/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.