Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi 17T Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $950 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 82/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,182,664); the Xiaomi 17T Pro is noticeably lighter (205g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Ultra
Xiaomi 17T Pro
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3182664
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3293
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10243
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 93/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17T Pro better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 205g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $950
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 85/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 17T Pro, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 9 points higher (91/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100, Xiaomi 17T Pro — 76/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17T Pro (96/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (87/100 vs 85/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi 17T Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | 3182664 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 2772x1280 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 230 g | 205 g | |
| Launch price | $950 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 18:30 hrs, total 36:42 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 17T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi 17T Pro by 33.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $51. Xiaomi 17T Pro was $51 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17T Pro (96/100 vs 63/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (87/100 vs 85/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Xiaomi 17T Pro by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi 17T Pro — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 63/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 93/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.