Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1299 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 79/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 2,800,202); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 151).
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 9553
- Lighter: 218g vs 226g
- Better display (88/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (46/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 2800202
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 3100
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $1299
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 8 points higher (87/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 66/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2800202 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3100 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9760 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 151 | 171 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / One UI 7 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 218 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $1299 | $899 |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra by 14.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $400. Vivo X300 Pro was $400 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (96/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (81/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.