Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Vivo X500 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro; launch prices were $1299 and $970. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 79/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X500 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (5,016,623 vs 2,780,751); the Vivo X500 Pro is noticeably lighter (192g vs 218g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Vivo X500 Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 79/100
What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5016623 vs 2780751
- Better Geekbench Single: 4188 vs 3100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 13145 vs 9760
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 192g vs 218g
- Cheaper at launch: $970 vs $1299
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 88/100)
- Better portability (63/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 11 points higher (90/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 68/100, Vivo X500 Pro — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (100/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (87/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (63/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo X500 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | 2780751 | 5016623 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3100 | 4188 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9760 | 13145 | |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.4" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 1216x2660 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 151 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / One UI 7 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 218 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $1299 | $970 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo X500 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2660
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Vivo X500 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X500 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra by 44.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $329. Vivo X500 Pro was $329 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (100/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (87/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (81/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (63/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 81/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 91/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra over the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.