Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Vivo X500 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro; launch prices were $799 and $970. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 74/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4000); the Vivo X500 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (5,016,623 vs 2,827,538); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 192g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S26
Vivo X500 Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 better?
- Lighter: 162g vs 192g
- Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $970
- Better portability (89/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5016623 vs 2827538
- Better Geekbench Single: 4188 vs 2880
- Better Geekbench Multi: 13145 vs 9100
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 89/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 77/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 31/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 16 points higher (90/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (100/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (87/100 vs 77/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26 — 62/100, Vivo X500 Pro — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (100/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (87/100 vs 77/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (81/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Vivo X500 Pro (89/100 vs 63/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 | Vivo X500 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 2600 | MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | 2827538 | 5016623 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2880 | 4188 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9100 | 13145 | |
| Display | 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.4" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1216x2660 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 146 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 162 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $799 | $970 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo X500 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2660
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 and Vivo X500 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X500 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S26 by 43.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $171. Samsung Galaxy S26 was $171 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (100/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (87/100 vs 77/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (81/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Vivo X500 Pro (89/100 vs 63/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S26 — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 and the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 77/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 89/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 over the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.