Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $799 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 74/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 4000); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 2,827,538); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S26 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S26

Performance 89
Display 81
Camera 77
Battery 31
Portability 89
Value for money 62

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 better?

  • Lighter: 162g vs 227g

  • Better portability (89/100 vs 35/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 2827538
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2880
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9100
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 77/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 81/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 15 points higher (89/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26 — 62/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26 are nearly equal (78/100 vs 77/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (92/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (89/100 vs 35/100).

Samsung Galaxy S26: The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S26 Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Samsung Exynos 2600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2827538 4602290
Geekbench Single 2880 3639
Geekbench Multi 9100 11047
Display 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2340x1080 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 25W 120W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 146 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 162 g 227 g
Launch price $799 $799

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S26

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
77
camera

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S26

  • 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S26

  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
31
battery

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600
74/100
2827538 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +38.6%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S26 by 38.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S26

$799

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Launch price difference: $0. Same launch price.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (99/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26 are nearly equal (78/100 vs 77/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (92/100 vs 31/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (89/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S26 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 89/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.