Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Vivo iQOO 15
The Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $799 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 66/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,740,528 vs 2,856,499); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 215g).
Samsung Galaxy S26
Vivo iQOO 15
- Lighter: 162g vs 215g
- Better portability (89/100 vs 48/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3740528 vs 2856499
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2880
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 9100
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $799
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 31/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 81/100)
- Better value for money (84/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 20 points higher (86/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (84/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (85/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (89/100 vs 48/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (84/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 | Vivo iQOO 15 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2856499 | 3740528 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2880 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9100 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 162 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | $799 | $599 |
Samsung Galaxy S26
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo iQOO 15
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO 15
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15 leads Samsung Galaxy S26 by 23.6% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $200. Vivo iQOO 15 was $200 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (99/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (78/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (85/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (89/100 vs 48/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (84/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 by 20 points (86/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 and the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 over the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.