Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $2199 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 88/100 vs 77/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 3,453,998).

The Vivo iQOO 15 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

Performance 96
Display 78
Camera 67
Battery 61
Portability 44
Value for money 62

Vivo iQOO 15

Performance 98
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 90

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra better?

  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Overall rating 77/100

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 3453998
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 60W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 25W
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $2199

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 96/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 67/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (48/100 vs 44/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 11 points higher (88/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 61/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 62/100, Vivo iQOO 15 — 90/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (98/100 vs 96/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (99/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (78/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (85/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (48/100 vs 44/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Vivo iQOO 15
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3453998 3950082
Geekbench Single 3639 3639
Geekbench Multi 11047 11047
Display 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1968x2184 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 60W 100W
Wireless charging 25W 40W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 16
Brightness (peak) — 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions — 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 215 g 215 g
Launch price $2199 $599

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
67
camera

Vivo iQOO 15

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

  • 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1968x2184
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Vivo iQOO 15

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery

Vivo iQOO 15

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
77/100
3453998 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
88/100 +12.6%
3950082 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra by 12.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

$2199

Vivo iQOO 15

$599

Launch price difference: $1600. Vivo iQOO 15 was $1600 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (98/100 vs 96/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (99/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (78/100 vs 67/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (85/100 vs 61/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (48/100 vs 44/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 67/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.