Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $2199 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 78/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,453,998); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is noticeably lighter (215g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra better?
- Lighter: 215g vs 230g
- Better portability (66/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3453998
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 60W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 25W
- Cheaper at launch: $950 vs $2199
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 96/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 67/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 61/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 78/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 13 points higher (91/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 61/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 64/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (99/100 vs 96/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (96/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (85/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (66/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3453998 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 11047 | |
| Display | 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1968x2184 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 60W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 215 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $2199 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra by 18.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1249. Vivo X300 Ultra was $1249 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (99/100 vs 96/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (96/100 vs 67/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (85/100 vs 61/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (66/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 67/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.