Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $2199 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 87/100 vs 71/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,942,923); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is noticeably lighter (215g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 215g vs 230g
- Better design/ergonomics (31/100 vs 12/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3942923
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 60W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 25W
- Cheaper: $950 vs $2199
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (44/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 16 points higher (87/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (77/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (44/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (96/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (77/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (31/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (44/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 11033 | |
| Display | 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1968x2184 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 60W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 215 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $2199 | $950 |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra by 7.2% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1249. Vivo X300 Ultra is cheaper by $1249.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (96/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (96/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (77/100 vs 51/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (31/100 vs 12/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (44/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.