Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1531 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 69/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4400); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,119,308); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is noticeably lighter (215g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 215g vs 230g
- Better portability (66/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3119308
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9494
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Cheaper: $950 vs $1531
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 78/100)
- Better value for money (94/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 22 points higher (91/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (94/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (96/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (85/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (66/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (94/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 11033 | |
| Display | 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2 | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1968x2184 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 215 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $1531 | $950 |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 by 26.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $581. Vivo X300 Ultra is cheaper by $581.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (96/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (85/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (66/100 vs 39/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (94/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 by 22 points (91/100 vs 69/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 92/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.