Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1999 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 75/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 3,065,623); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X200 Ultra has the stronger camera (167 vs 145); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is thinner (4.2mm vs 8.7mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 215g vs 229g
- Better portability (66/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 3065623
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 2910
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 9174
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Cheaper at launch: $889 vs $1999
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 78/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 11 points higher (86/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 58/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (93/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (78/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (66/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3065623 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2910 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9174 | 10095 | |
| Display | 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2184x1968 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 145 | 167 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 215 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $1999 | $889 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2184x1968
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 by 0.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1110. Vivo X200 Ultra was $1110 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (93/100 vs 76/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (78/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (66/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.