Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $2199 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 78/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,453,998 vs 3,092,340); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is thinner (4.1mm vs 8.7mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3453998 vs 3092340
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10095
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 215g vs 229g
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 92/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 60W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 25W
- Cheaper at launch: $889 vs $2199
- Better camera (93/100 vs 67/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 61/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 78/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 8 points higher (86/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 61/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 64/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (96/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (93/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (66/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3453998 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 10095 | |
| Display | 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1968x2184 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 60W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 215 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $2199 | $889 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads Vivo X200 Ultra by 11.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1310. Vivo X200 Ultra was $1310 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (96/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (93/100 vs 67/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (78/100 vs 61/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (66/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 67/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.