Huawei P50 Pocket vs ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
The Huawei P50 Pocket (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, while the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G leads — 61/100 vs 51/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G has the bigger battery (4200 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 40 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G has NFC for contactless payments, the Huawei P50 Pocket doesn't.
Huawei P50 Pocket
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- Overall rating 51/100
- Bigger battery: 4200 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 40MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 183g vs 190g
- Better camera (63/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (30/100 vs 27/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)
- Better portability (70/100 vs 69/100)
Comparing the Huawei P50 Pocket vs the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G scores 10 points higher (61/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G leads (63/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 63/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G significantly outperforms the Huawei P50 Pocket (63/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G and the Huawei P50 Pocket are nearly equal (30/100 vs 27/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G and the Huawei P50 Pocket are nearly equal (70/100 vs 69/100).
| Specification | Huawei P50 Pocket | ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | |
| AnTuTu | 1119714 | 1119714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1488 | 1488 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3373 | 3373 | |
| Display | 6.9" OLED | 6.7" Amoled | |
| Resolution | 2790x1188 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4200 mAh | |
| Charging | 40W | — | |
| Main camera | 40 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | — | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | HarmonyOS 2.0 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.6×75.3×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 183 g | |
| Price | $1410 | — |
Huawei P50 Pocket
- Main: 40MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 10MP
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Front: —
Huawei P50 Pocket
- 6.9" OLED
- Resolution: 2790x1188
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- 6.7" Amoled
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Huawei P50 Pocket
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 40W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- 4200 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Huawei P50 Pocket and ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 63/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G significantly outperforms the Huawei P50 Pocket (63/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G and the Huawei P50 Pocket are nearly equal (30/100 vs 27/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G and the Huawei P50 Pocket are nearly equal (70/100 vs 69/100).
Which is better: the Huawei P50 Pocket or the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
The ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is noticeably better than the Huawei P50 Pocket — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Huawei P50 Pocket and the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
The Huawei P50 Pocket has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G — 61/100.
Which has the better camera: the Huawei P50 Pocket or the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
The ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G leads on camera score (63/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Huawei P50 Pocket over the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
The Huawei P50 Pocket is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is a better fit for active users.