Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $2199 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 78/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,453,998 vs 3,326,259); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is thinner (4.1mm vs 8.0mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3453998 vs 3326259
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3293
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10243
- Lighter: 215g vs 226g
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 94/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 60W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 25W
- Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $2199
- Better camera (96/100 vs 67/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 61/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 78/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 10 points higher (88/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 61/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 64/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (96/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (81/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (66/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3453998 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 10243 | |
| Display | 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1968x2184 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 60W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 215 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $2199 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads Vivo X300 Pro by 3.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1300. Vivo X300 Pro was $1300 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (96/100 vs 67/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (81/100 vs 61/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (66/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 67/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.