Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $1531 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 69/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4400); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 3,119,308); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is thinner (4.2mm vs 8.0mm).
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 215g vs 226g
- Better portability (66/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 3119308
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 9494
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Cheaper: $899 vs $1531
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 78/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 18 points higher (87/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (96/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (81/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (86/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9553 | |
| Display | 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2 | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1968x2184 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 215 g | 226 g | |
| Price | $1531 | $899 |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 by 4.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $632. Vivo X300 Pro is cheaper by $632.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (96/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (81/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (66/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (86/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.