Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (2026) runs on the Exynos 2600, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1099 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 88/100 vs 66/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4300); the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 3,113,347); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is noticeably lighter (180g vs 215g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 by 22 points (88/100 vs 66/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

Performance 93
Display 80
Camera 35
Battery 37
Portability 80
Value for money 42

Vivo iQOO 15

Performance 98
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 90

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 better?

  • Lighter: 180g vs 215g

  • Better portability (80/100 vs 48/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 3113347
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3235
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10904
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4300 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $1099

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 93/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 80/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 22 points higher (88/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 — 42/100, Vivo iQOO 15 — 90/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (98/100 vs 93/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (99/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (78/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (85/100 vs 37/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (80/100 vs 48/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 Vivo iQOO 15
Processor Exynos 2600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3113347 3950082
Geekbench Single 3235 3639
Geekbench Multi 10904 11047
Display 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2520 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4300 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions — 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 180 g 215 g
Launch price $1099 $599

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
35
camera

Vivo iQOO 15

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

  • 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1080x2520
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Vivo iQOO 15

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

  • 4300 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
37
battery

Vivo iQOO 15

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 Exynos 2600
66/100
3113347 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
88/100 +21.2%
3950082 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 by 21.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

$1099

Vivo iQOO 15

$599

Launch price difference: $500. Vivo iQOO 15 was $500 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (98/100 vs 93/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (99/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (78/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (85/100 vs 37/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (80/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 by 22 points (88/100 vs 66/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on performance (98/100 vs 93/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.