Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1799 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 57/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 2,926,532); the Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably lighter (285g vs 309g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 2926532
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3050
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9300
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Lighter: 285g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $1799 vs $2899
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 67/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 49/100)
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 20 points higher (77/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (92/100 vs 67/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (91/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 9300 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $1799 | $2899 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 34.7% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1100. Motorola Razr Fold is cheaper by $1100.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (92/100 vs 67/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (91/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100).
design
In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 20 points (77/100 vs 57/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 49/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 67/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.