Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1799 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 69/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 2,926,532); the Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably lighter (285g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 2926532
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 285g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $1799 vs $2899
- Better camera (91/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2833
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 9119
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 69/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 14 points higher (83/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 90/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (81/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (52/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 9287 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 4.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1100. Motorola Razr Fold was $1100 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 90/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (81/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (91/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (52/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.