Motorola Signature 27 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Motorola Signature 27 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Signature 27 leads — 92/100 vs 69/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Signature 27 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Signature 27 is faster in AnTuTu (5,153,294 vs 2,926,532).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Signature 27
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Motorola Signature 27 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5153294 vs 2926532
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 70/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 69/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Signature 27 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Motorola Signature 27 scores 23 points higher (92/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature 27 leads (100/100 vs 90/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature 27 leads (87/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature 27 leads (80/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature 27 is a bit better (100/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Signature 27 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature 27 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (87/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature 27 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (80/100 vs 63/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Signature 27 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 5153294 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 4327 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 12873 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | — | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Signature 27
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Motorola Signature 27
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Signature 27
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Signature 27 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Signature 27 leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 76.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Signature 27
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature 27 is a bit better (100/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Signature 27 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature 27 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (87/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature 27 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (80/100 vs 63/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Signature 27 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Signature 27 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 23 points (92/100 vs 69/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Signature 27 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Signature 27 has a MobileRank rating of 92/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Signature 27 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Signature 27 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Signature 27 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Signature 27 leads on performance (100/100 vs 90/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Signature 27 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Signature 27 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.