Motorola Signature vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Motorola Signature (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $699 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Signature leads — 86/100 vs 57/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Signature is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 2,926,532); the Motorola Signature is noticeably lighter (186g vs 309g).
Motorola Signature
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 2926532
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3050
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9300
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 186g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $699 vs $2899
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 67/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 49/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 52/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (62/100 vs 0/100)
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5200 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 57/100
Comparing the Motorola Signature vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Motorola Signature scores 29 points higher (86/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature leads (92/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature leads (91/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature leads (68/100 vs 52/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Signature leads (62/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (92/100 vs 67/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (91/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (68/100 vs 52/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (62/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Motorola Signature | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×76.4×7.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $699 | $2899 |
Motorola Signature
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Signature
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Signature
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Signature and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Signature leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 34.7% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2200. Motorola Signature is cheaper by $2200.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (92/100 vs 67/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (91/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (68/100 vs 52/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (67/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (62/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Signature or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 29 points (86/100 vs 57/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Signature and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Signature has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Signature or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Signature leads on camera score (91/100 vs 49/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Signature or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Signature leads on performance (92/100 vs 67/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Signature over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Signature is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.