Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1099 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 57/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 2,926,532); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 2926532
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3050
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9300
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $1099 vs $2899
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 67/100)
- Better camera (58/100 vs 49/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (34/100 vs 0/100)
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 16 points higher (73/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 67/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (34/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (92/100 vs 67/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (34/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 9300 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $2899 |
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 34.7% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1800. Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is cheaper by $1800.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (92/100 vs 67/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (34/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on camera score (58/100 vs 49/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 67/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.