Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1499 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 69/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 2,926,532); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 2926532
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Lighter: 199g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $1499 vs $2899
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 20/100)
- Better value for money (62/100 vs 42/100)
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 69/100
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 9 points higher (78/100 vs 69/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (62/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (95/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (60/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (68/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (62/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9494 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $1499 | $2899 |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 15.5% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1400. Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is cheaper by $1400.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (95/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (60/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (68/100 vs 20/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (62/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.