Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1499 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 69/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 2,926,532); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 2926532
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Lighter: 199g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $1499 vs $2899
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 69/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 9 points higher (78/100 vs 69/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (95/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (60/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (68/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 9287 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 15.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1400. Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 was $1400 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (95/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (60/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (68/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.