Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; launch prices were $1799 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 84/100 vs 74/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,068,952 vs 2,175,587); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 144); the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is noticeably lighter (232g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3068952 vs 2175587
- Better Geekbench Single: 2903 vs 2250
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9602 vs 7200
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 56/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 34/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 232g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $1299 vs $1799
- Better display (88/100 vs 81/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 10 points higher (84/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (71/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 72/100, Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra — 56/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (91/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (71/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (52/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3068952 | 2175587 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2903 | 2250 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9602 | 7200 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 3088x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 144 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 / One UI 6.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 162.3×79.0×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 232 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $1299 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- 6.8" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3088x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra by 41.1% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $500. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra was $500 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (91/100 vs 76/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (71/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (52/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 76/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (91/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.