Motorola Razr Fold vs Nothing Phone (3)
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Nothing Phone (3) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4; launch prices were $1799 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 77/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (3) has the bigger battery (5150 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 2,371,693); the Nothing Phone (3) is noticeably lighter (198g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Nothing Phone (3)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 2371693
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 2162
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 6847
- Faster charging: 68W vs 65W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 63/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 49/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (3) better?
- Bigger battery: 5150 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 198g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $1799
- Better display (85/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Nothing Phone (3), the Motorola Razr Fold scores 6 points higher (83/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 81/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Nothing Phone (3) — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Nothing Phone (3) and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (3) are nearly equal (52/100 vs 49/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Nothing Phone (3) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 2371693 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 2162 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 6847 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5150 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 65W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 160.6×75.6×9.0 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 198 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $799 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing Phone (3)
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nothing Phone (3)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Nothing Phone (3)
- 5150 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Nothing Phone (3), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Nothing Phone (3) by 28.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1000. Nothing Phone (3) was $1000 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nothing Phone (3) and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (3) are nearly equal (52/100 vs 49/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Nothing Phone (3) by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Nothing Phone (3) — 77/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 81/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Nothing Phone (3) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.