Motorola Razr Fold vs Nothing Phone (3a) Pro

The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; estimated prices are $1799 and $459. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 43/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,063,102); the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is noticeably lighter (201g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro by 34 points (77/100 vs 43/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 91
Battery 51
Design 0
Value for money 0
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Performance 7
Display 100
Camera 62
Battery 44
Design 48
Value for money 78
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1063102
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1162
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3315
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 50W

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 7/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 62/100)
  • Longer battery life (51/100 vs 44/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (3a) Pro better?
  • Lighter: 201g vs 285g
  • Cheaper: $459 vs $1799

  • Better design/ergonomics (48/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (78/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 34 points higher (77/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 7/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 62/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro leads (78/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (92/100 vs 7/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (91/100 vs 62/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (51/100 vs 44/100). In the "design" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (48/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (78/100 vs 0/100).

Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro: The Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr Fold Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
AnTuTu 3942923 1063102
Geekbench Single 3640 1162
Geekbench Multi 11033 3315
Display 8.1" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2480x2200 2392x1080
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 68W 50W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 164
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1
Brightness (peak) 6200 nits 3000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX9 IP54
Dimensions 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm 163.5×77.5×8.4 mm
Weight 285 g 201 g
Price $1799 $459
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
62
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2392x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
51
battery
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 50W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Nothing Phone (3a) Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
77/100
3942923 AnTuTu
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
43/100 -270.9%
1063102 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Nothing Phone (3a) Pro by 270.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr Fold
$1799
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
$459

Price difference: $1340. Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is cheaper by $1340.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (92/100 vs 7/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (91/100 vs 62/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (51/100 vs 44/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (48/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (78/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro by 34 points (77/100 vs 43/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro — 43/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 62/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 7/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.