Motorola Razr Fold vs Nothing Phone (2)

The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Nothing Phone (2) (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; launch prices were $1799 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 63/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 1,436,634); the Nothing Phone (2) is noticeably lighter (201g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) by 20 points (83/100 vs 63/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr Fold

Performance 90
Display 81
Camera 91
Battery 68
Portability 52
Value for money 74

Nothing Phone (2)

Performance 68
Display 80
Camera 57
Battery 50
Portability 52
Value for money 40

What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 1436634
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1500
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 4200
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 80/100)

What makes Nothing Phone (2) better?

  • Lighter: 201g vs 285g
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $1799

  • Overall rating 63/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Nothing Phone (2), the Motorola Razr Fold scores 20 points higher (83/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 50/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Nothing Phone (2) — 40/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (2) are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (91/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (68/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 52/100.

Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Nothing Phone (2): The Nothing Phone (2) is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr Fold Nothing Phone (2)
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
AnTuTu 3057215 1436634
Geekbench Single 2833 1500
Geekbench Multi 9119 4200
Display 8.1" LTPO AMOLED 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2480x2200 2412x1080
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4700 mAh
Charging 68W 45W
Wireless charging 50W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 164 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 13 / Nothing OS 2.0
Brightness (peak) 6200 nits 1600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX9 IP54
Dimensions 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm 162.1×76.4×8.6 mm
Weight 285 g 201 g
Launch price $1799 $599

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr Fold

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera

Nothing Phone (2)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Nothing Phone (2)

  • 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2412x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 50W
68
battery

Nothing Phone (2)

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
50
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Nothing Phone (2), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
83/100
3057215 AnTuTu
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
63/100 -112.8%
1436634 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Nothing Phone (2) by 112.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr Fold

$1799

Nothing Phone (2)

$599

Launch price difference: $1200. Nothing Phone (2) was $1200 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (90/100 vs 68/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (2) are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (91/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) (68/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 52/100.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (2)?

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2) by 20 points (83/100 vs 63/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (2)?

The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Nothing Phone (2) — 63/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (2)?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 57/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (2)?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 68/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Nothing Phone (2)?

The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Nothing Phone (2) is a better fit for active users.